Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git--- name: finishing-a-development-branch description: Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work --- # Finishing a Development Branch ## Overview **Core principle:** Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work." ## Step 1: Verify Tests Run the project's full test suite (`npm test` / `cargo test` / `pytest` / `go test ./...`). **If tests fail**, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite: ``` Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing: [Show failures] ``` **If tests pass:** continue to Step 2. ## Step 2: Detect Environment ```bash GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) # Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory # before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) ``` This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works: | State | Menu | Cleanup | |-------|------|---------| | `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (normal repo) | Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up | | `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, named branch | Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) | | `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, detached HEAD | Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed — leave in place | ## Step 3: Determine Base Branch The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. ## Step 4: Present Options **Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:** ``` Implementation complete. What would you like to do? 1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally 2. Push and create a Pull Request 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) Which option? ``` **Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:** ``` Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace). 1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request 2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later) Which option? ``` Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs. ## Step 5: Execute Choice ### Option 1: Merge Locally ```bash # Get main repo root for CWD safety MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" # Merge first — verify success before removing anything git checkout <base-branch> git pull git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> ``` If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable. Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch: ```bash git branch -d <feature-branch> ``` ### Option 2: Push and Create PR ```bash git push -u origin <feature-branch> # From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote: # git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch> ``` Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner. Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there. ### Option 3: Keep As-Is Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>." ### If your human partner asks to discard the work This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first: ``` This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <commit-list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm. ``` Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives: ```bash MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" ``` Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch: ```bash git branch -D <feature-branch> ``` ## Step 6: Cleanup Workspace **Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards.** Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the `GIT_DIR`/`GIT_COMMON`/`WORKTREE_PATH` values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change. **If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`:** Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done. **If `WORKTREE_PATH` is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup: ```bash git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH" git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations ``` **Otherwise:** The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it. ## Quick Reference | Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes | | 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - | | Discard (explicit request only) | - | - | - | yes (force) | ## Common Rationalizations | Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Tests passed earlier this session" | Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on. | | "They obviously want it merged" | Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait. | | "They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it" | The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words. | | "'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation" | Only the typed word `discard` authorizes deletion. | | "The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now" | PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands. | | "This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too" | Clean up only worktrees under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`. Everything else belongs to the host. | | "The merged-result failure is probably flaky" | A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate. | | "The base branch is obviously main" | Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. | | "The push was rejected — force-push will fix it" | A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request. |
1. **Prepare the Branch:** Ensure all tests pass locally and in CI. Run `git status` to confirm no uncommitted changes remain. Use `git log --oneline` to review the commit history for potential squash candidates. 2. **Evaluate Integration Options:** Consider the team's merge strategy (e.g., squash, rebase, or merge commit) and repository history. Use `git log --graph --oneline main..[BRANCH_NAME]` to visualize the divergence from `main`. 3. **Draft Integration Plan:** Decide on the best approach (e.g., squash for feature branches, rebase for personal branches). Use `git rebase -i main` to clean up commits if needed. 4. **Document Risks:** Identify potential conflicts, dependencies, or rollback requirements. Share the plan with the team via PR description or Slack. 5. **Execute:** Follow the plan to integrate the branch, ensuring all stakeholders are aligned. Monitor the deployment for any issues post-integration. **Tips:** - Use `git merge --no-ff` to preserve branch history if the team prefers explicit merge commits. - For large branches, consider a 'merge-and-squash' strategy to reduce noise in the main branch. - Always communicate the integration plan to the team to avoid surprises.
No install command available. Check the GitHub repository for manual installation instructions.
git clone https://github.com/obra/superpowers/tree/main/skills/finishing-a-development-branchCopy the install command above and run it in your terminal.
Launch Claude Code, Cursor, or your preferred AI coding agent.
Use the prompt template or examples below to test the skill.
Adapt the skill to your specific use case and workflow.
Review the completed development branch [BRANCH_NAME] for [PROJECT_NAME]. Verify that all tests pass and no critical issues remain. Recommend the best integration strategy (merge, rebase, squash, or cherry-pick) based on [REPOSITORY_HISTORY] and [TEAM_PRACTICES]. Include a step-by-step plan for the integration process and highlight any potential risks or dependencies.
For the 'feature/auth-improvements' branch in the 'ecommerce-backend' project, the following integration plan is recommended: **Integration Strategy:** Merge via a Pull Request (PR) with squash enabled. This branch contains 12 commits, many of which are fixup commits addressing review feedback. Squashing will clean up the history while preserving the logical changes. The team follows a 'squash-and-merge' policy for feature branches to maintain a linear history. **Step-by-Step Plan:** 1. **Pre-Merge Checks:** Run `npm run test:unit` and `npm run test:integration` locally to confirm all tests pass. The branch currently shows 100% test coverage, with no failing tests in the CI pipeline (last run: 2023-11-15 14:30 UTC). 2. **Update Dependencies:** Ensure the branch is up-to-date with `main` by running `git pull origin main`. Resolve any merge conflicts locally before pushing. 3. **Create PR:** Open a PR titled 'feat: improve authentication flow (#1234)' with the description: 'Addresses [JIRA-TICKET-456] and [JIRA-TICKET-789]. Changes include: (1) JWT refresh token implementation, (2) rate limiting for login attempts, and (3) session validation middleware.' Enable 'Squash and Merge' in the PR settings. 4. **Review:** Request reviews from @dev-lead and @security-reviewer. Address any feedback by amending commits or adding new fixup commits. 5. **Merge:** Once approved, merge the PR and delete the branch. The squashed commit will appear as 'feat: improve authentication flow' in the main branch history. **Potential Risks:** - The new session validation middleware may conflict with existing OAuth flows. Coordinate with the frontend team to test the integration. - The JWT refresh token implementation requires a database schema change (new `refresh_tokens` table). Ensure the migration script is included in the PR. **Dependencies:** - The frontend team is waiting for this branch to implement the new login UI. Plan to deploy this branch to staging by EOD tomorrow to unblock them.
skills-collection
Take a free 3-minute scan and get personalized AI skill recommendations.
Take free scan