agent-skills-code-review-router

🥈Silver

Automates code review routing to the right developer based on expertise and availability. Benefits engineering teams by reducing review bottlenecks and improving code quality. Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket for workflow.

12390Updated 1mo ago

Intermediate30min to implementautomation

Saves ~60 min per use

Quick InstallView Source

git clone https://github.com/win4r/agent-skills-code-review-router.git

Works with:

Claude

Overview

About This Skill

How to Use

1. **Integrate with your VCS:** Connect the router to GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket using the provided API keys (e.g., GitHub Actions or a custom webhook). Ensure it has read access to PRs, commits, and team member data. 2. **Define team parameters:** Configure expertise criteria (e.g., file paths, language experience) and availability (e.g., GitHub status, calendar sync). Use past review history to refine matches. 3. **Set routing rules:** Customize rules like 'prioritize reviewers with no open PRs' or 'exclude reviewers on vacation.' 4. **Test with a sample PR:** Run a dry test on a non-critical PR to validate the router’s suggestions before full deployment. 5. **Monitor and iterate:** Track review times and conflicts. Adjust criteria based on team feedback (e.g., if certain reviewers are consistently overloaded). **Tip:** Use the router’s output to pre-populate review requests in your VCS (e.g., GitHub’s 'Assignees' field) to save time.

Setup & Installation

Quick Install

No install command available. Check the GitHub repository for manual installation instructions.

Alternative Install (Git Clone)

git clone https://github.com/win4r/agent-skills-code-review-router

Requirements

Claude Code or compatible AI agent
Works with: Claude

Quick Start Guide

Install the Skill

Copy the install command above and run it in your terminal.

Open Your AI Agent

Launch Claude Code, Cursor, or your preferred AI coding agent.

Try It Out

Use the prompt template or examples below to test the skill.

Customize

Adapt the skill to your specific use case and workflow.

Usage Examples

Prompt Template

Act as a code review router for [TEAM_NAME]. Review the pull request [PR_NUMBER] in [REPO_NAME] (language: [LANGUAGE]). Based on the code changes, match the most suitable reviewer from the team using these criteria: 1) [EXPERTISE_CRITERIA], 2) [AVAILABILITY_CRITERIA], 3) [PAST_REVIEW_HISTORY]. Suggest 1-2 reviewers and explain your reasoning. Include estimated review time and any potential conflicts (e.g., reviewer is OOO).

Example Output

For PR #42 in the `api-service` repository (Python), I recommend assigning this to **Sarah Chen** (Senior Backend Engineer) with **Alex Rivera** as backup. 

**Reasoning:**
- **Expertise:** Sarah authored 60% of the core API endpoints and has 3+ years of experience with FastAPI, the framework used in this PR. She also contributed to the database migration logic being modified.
- **Availability:** Currently has 2 open reviews (both minor) and no scheduled PTO this week.
- **Past Reviews:** Sarah has a 92% approval rate for API-related PRs and previously reviewed similar changes in PR #18.

**Estimated Review Time:** 45 minutes (moderate complexity with 120 lines changed).

**Conflicts:** None for Sarah. Alex Rivera (alternate) is available but has limited experience with FastAPI migrations—suitable only if Sarah is unavailable.

**Next Steps:** Assign to Sarah; notify via Slack #eng-reviews channel with a link to the PR and estimated completion time.